Religious Ecstasy


www.mysticism.nl




From time to time it gets a hold of me. Then I can feel God begin to jubilate inside of me. Most of the time it is accompanied by much ‘body riot’. Sometimes that ‘riot’ even resembles the fits the mentally disabled probably experience, when they lose themselves in violent shocks of the abdomen and the spine, in tearful eyes, and foam on their mouth. In frenzy I dance around the room shouting out words, that I would not want anybody to hear, suspecting they’ll think I have gone luny. This kind of performance can hardly be called art. It is indeed a madness which gets a hold of you,ecstacy by Karin Elisabeth Schlüter Lonegren but it is some sort of a divine madness, a mania daimonike. I frequently have these fits at hearing music which affects me or at reading a passage in a book that stirs me or when suddenly a deep insight dawns. Sometimes it even happens out of the sheer blue, without a reason. Then I leap up and I feel the ecstasy get a hold of me  It’s strange that such a fit always keeps the middle between utter happiness and deep grief, as if these two feelings are mutually extensive and the one is not possible without the other. Without any predictable order these two emotions overlap each other. Sorrow and happiness seem to deepen each other and to give mutual significance.


During these ecstatic fits the consciousness continues to function normally, however embedded in violent emotions it may be. It is like a hurricane raging through the soul. I sometimes wonder why these ecstatic moments are so intense and so vigorous. Can it be that one is experiencing by then the creative strength of your whole organism or perhaps even of the whole of creation? Perhaps this is the most striking external characteristic of ecstasy: that explosive bundling of energy which is looking for a way out. You dance, you sing and you praise God. You feel complete. You loses yourself and find your Self. God is chuckling exuberantly in the deepest of your soul.

But always is there: awareness. Possibly this is the second most striking feature of religious ecstasy. For this vigorously rotating hurricane also has a quiet eye from where everything is observed. Despite the violent emotionality there always remains a still rationality at work. The rational capacities are not in the least eliminated by the raging hurricane. And this is I think the variable that enables us to distinguish religious madness from other types of madness. In other forms of self loss consciousness is totally erased because a deep notion of what occurs would be too painful and could not be endured by the weak ego. In real madness one loses its self, while floating completely rudderless and desperately around in the storm. In religious madness one finds its Self again. Religious frenzy points to what you really are. Only this form of self loss is pleasant because by now you obtain something that is better than your old self has ever been. The ecstasy gives you glimpses of your new Self, the face which you had  before your were born. The ecstasy makes you conscious of your own potential, of the regions your consciousness will expand to.

What can this still awareness in the middle of the hurricane else be than God’s own eye, which looks at creation and sees that it is all well? At that moment of frenzied ecstasy God  is suddenly aware of ecstacyItself. Then divinity contemplates Its own energy, Its own love and Its own beauty. Then It is prone to burst out in dancing and jubilation because by then the circle is round. Then consciousness has become aware of itself. And with that the ultimate goal of everything has been reached!  For what else can the purpose  of the Divine Play be? Maybe this is the only reason why there is life in this universe, that evolution can bring itself to a phase in which the divine eventually will be Self referring.  In the ecstasy this moment already announces itself for the glimpse of a second.  Not yet as permanent feature of the human spirit, but merely as a passing storm. But nevertheless  the ecstasy lets us  already experience what will be possible in human consciousness in the near future. 

And that brings me to ask the following questions: why is ecstasy not a permanent state? What do we have to do to make it permanent? Why are we so seldom ecstatic? The answer is in fact relatively simple: we simply do not allow ourselves to be so. We all have made ecstasy a cultural taboo, not only the drug induced ecstasy, but also the pure religious ecstasy. We seem to be afraid of being ecstatic. For ecstasy appears to be undermining all our certainties and all of our fixed patterns of behavior. She is too vigorous and her energy is not seldom devastating. We seem not to be able to manage her enormous power. But it is funny in a way if we consider that everyone wants be ecstatic to the depth of his soul.

Young people still have it, the desire and the aptitude for ecstasy. They want to live entirely ecstatic, in music, in their contacts with their friends, in their sex and their drugs, but also in the dream world of fantasy and art. Their ego has not yet set up too strong a defense against the ecstacic impulses from their subconsciousness. These impulses point to what potentially is present in the sub- and supraconsciousness. As from birth a spirituality develops in human consciousness that can later on lead to self realisation. Even in young people that spirituality is already developing. Only at a laterBernini's ecstacy of St. Theresa stage, say from the late twenties, can that spirituality begin to fully blosom, when the ego has reached full maturity and the mental faculties are well established. Only at that time has  consciousness developed this far that it can understand and can integrate the spiritual dimensions of the mind and the soul.

One would expect therefore older people to be more ecstatic than younger people. For their spiritual capacities seem to be more developed. And this seems to be the case. If you are ecstatic when being older than the experience will be much more profound than when you are young. You have much more insight in the emotional workings of ecstasy and what kind of theoretical insights the ecstatic moments provide. Your feelings and your thoughts are far more integrated than when you were young. The ecstasy has become a real religious experience. When you are young the ecstasy seems more to be part of your lust for recreation, for 'having a good time'. This kind of ecstasy is more superficial. She doesn't last longer than the 'kick' lasts. She is experienced but not sufficiently understood. She has no full grown spiritual dimension.

But why are older people nevertheless less ecstatic than younger people? Perhaps the disadvantageous inclination for self protection of the ripe ego is to be blamed. The ego of older people has become so strong in a life of self conservation, competition, ambition and the hunt for success, that by now it can completely repress the strength of ecstasy breaking loose. In young people the ego is not yet strong enough. The ego of the elderly ensures this subconscious repression because ecstasy tends to be very dangerous for the mental structures of the ego. Ecstasy is litterally a death threath. Because ecstasy is an indication from the subconsciousness (or rather the supraconscious, see the article on Roberto Assagioli) that further growth beyond the ego possible, because the ego is but a momentary stage that can be left behind  if you want to become fully mature and happy. But most of the people have turned their ego into a stronghold. All other aspects of the self are left out of the picture and are rejected. Ecstasy is one of the greatest enemies for her capacity to take in the stronghold and destroy it.

Society is very cunning at keeping at bay and repressing the disruptive feelings of ecstasy. Only in art and very seldom in institutionalized religion is ecstasy allowed, but always in a marginalized setting. It can and may never become a treath to social and cultural structure. This will never be allowed by society. So the fact that young people are more ecstatic has also to do with them being less nested inside the social structure. They are relatively free to enjoy their feelings of ecstasy. 'Enjoy while you are young!' we say to our children and we sigh because we know the implications of these words: to be older is less enjoyable.

But religious
ecstasy lies at the root of our existence. Not only when we are young. We are all ecstatic sculpture of ecstacyby nature. If somehow the Self is capable of scraping of all layers of conditioning, the soot that is blackening up our true nature, then there will shine out a Light of incredible power and magnitude. We only have to let this ecstasy happen and not stand in the way of it happening.  Our own personal will is the blockade. So we have to unconditionally surrender to this mighty Force. We have to step across the threshold of our little self, of our limited personality. We have to make contact again with our Original Face that we were since the beginning of time. It only needs a change, a transformation in our consciousness. We have to stop identifying ourself with our personality.

Then
ecstasy will be set loose, unhampered and unrepressed. Then jubilation will rise up in our hearts on moments we expect it the least. Then will we find true happiness, when we see a flower, when we hear beautiful music or when we caress a loved one. By then every stap will be a dance of joy. But who dares to surrender to a wider context? Will fear always keep ecstasy at bay? Who is brave enough to lose controle and give in? But now everyone seems to dread the spiritual freedom needed to experience ecstasy.




Arnhem, January 4 2003



www.mysticism.nl



gast Sign our guestbook!




MS banner