Home

 

The MG J-Type
 

Sixty years af ter the introduction of the J2 M.G. it is diffjcult to discern what design thought was put into the model. Was the J4, the 1933 racer and the development of the C-type, the driving force which determined the specification? Some of the story in John Thornley's "Maintaining the Breed" would indicate so. Or was it the logical development of the M, D, C and F-types? In those far-off days when the motor industry did not invest a lot of time, and multi-millions of pounds, in the development of new mode Is it is tempting, with hindsight, to think that the J2 was simply the next logical step in development and th at it just happened. The art of genius is to make things look easy.

 

Take the later, two inch longer, D-type chassis, replace the original AA cylinder head by the new AB cross-flow head from the C-type Montlhery racer; give it twin carburettors just a size or two smaller than the racer, add a four-speed gearbox from the Wolseley parts bin (Wolseley were wholly owned by Morris and supplied Morris and M.G. with many of their major parts); and top the lot with a completely new-style two-seat body, replacing the pointed-tail theme of the M-type and the 'twenties by the slab-tank, spare wheel on the back, cut-away door theme of the 'thirties. This was the J2 and it was an instant hit. Many of it's features set the fashion for years. Most sports cars of the 'thirties copied the body style; it remained the basic M.G. style until 1955, when the TF gave way to the aerodynamics of the MGA. The twin semi-downdraught S.U. carburettors (but not the crass-flow head) remained on M.G.s until the end of production at Abingdon.

 

Forty years ago when taking a J2 to motor club meetings, middle-aged men with TOs Nould say what asensation the car had been - more so than even the XK120 Jaguar! 80 '1lph was achieved on raad test. No names, but many sporting cars of two or even three­I;tres could not beat this - just look up contemporary road tests. Even the TD did not achieve that ("The Autocar", 15th May 1953). Today's equivalent would be if Rover Nere to produce an under 1 ,000cc sports car which had a higher top speed than some B.M.W.s and Porsches. The J2 undoubtedly set a new standard in small sports cars.

 

But all was not well. It has been said that the example which the great Sammy Davis Ninner at Le Mans, Brooklands, etc.) tested for "The Autocar" was specially tuned. How

 

Above is a J-type chassis at the factory.
Here it would appear to be
finished in a colour other than black
spappearsit was prepared for
 exibition or maybe it was still in primer awaiting painting

The J 2 four seater tourer. Note the door
line when compared to the earlier D-type body.

he tourer with the hood up. Unlike many four-seater

tourers, the J 2 still looked elegant
with the hood up and there was reasonable visibility, 

even with theside curtains fitted.
 

 

Every young man's dream in 1933.
The spartan simplicity and purity of line of
the J2 set the style for M.G.s for the next 20 years
and was imitated by other manufacturers. The

design ofthe windscreen supports changed three times during production of the J2.

                                                                                                         

How this might have been done is not said. One imagines that Mr. Davis would have noticed if a supercharger had been added and the pump fuels of the day did not give much scope for adventures such as raising the compression ratio. In his book "Wheelspin" the contemporary author and triallist Austen May complained that his J2, along with several others, did not go as weil as it should. A top speed of 65 mph instead of 80 mph indicates a problem of a fairly serious nature. His car was returned to the works. Af ter treatment is was returned "now capable in full measure of giving the anticipated high range of performance". But we are not told wh at the problem was or what was done to put it right. One theory centres on correct valve timing and the adjustment of valve stem length which can take many hours to get exactly right. Other weaknesses in the design which were exposed when the top speed was raised by over 1 0 mph and the peak rpm by some 1,500, were the brakes and the crankshaft. Cecil Kimber cured these in 1934 with the P-type having bigger brakes and heavier, three-bearing crankshaft. This together with the other modifications to the body and chassis made the car over two hundredweight heavier than the J2.

 

In the J-series of modeis, the J 1 was the open four-seater or close-coupled coupe. These cars were externally identical to the final D-types and cannot be distinguished with certainty until one opens the bonnet. The J3 was outwardly identical to the J2 except th at a Powerplus supercharger lived under the front apron. This fed an engine which had beén reduced to 750 cc by means of a shorter-throw crank, giving a useful improvement in performance and the ability to compete in the 750 cc class in competitions. The J4 was the sports-racer with high-pressure blower, close-ratio gearbox, outside exhaust, bigger brakes (the twelve inch type destined later for the P-type and many a private conversion on J2s) and a doorless body. The J5 was actually catalogued as an un-blown J4 (presumably with twin 1 1/4 inch semi-downdraft S.U.s?) but no car was ever delivered as such.

 

The factory produced a whole new range of publicity material to promote the new model and in the brochure "The New M.G. Midget - The Car With The Racing Pedigree" they listed the features including an "entirely new head design, two carburettors, ten miles an hour faster, more commodious coachwork, twelve volt lighting and starting, brakes better than ever, racing type wheels on all modeis" . They said that it's modest price of t 199.10.0. for the J2 was out of all proportion to the lavish equipment but I notice from the catalogue that the stop, tail and reverse lamp cost you an extra £ 1 .19.0! Incidentally for those trying to find wh at was original equipment on a J2 it is interesting to see that for an extra twelve guineas you could have all the deluxe equipment fitted at the factory; this included an electric clock, an Ashby steering wheel, stone guards on headlamps, oil thermometer, bonnet strip, snapped lever-type quick filler on petrol tank, the aforementioned stop, tail and reverse lamp and a radiator thermometer. AII the models now had leather upholstery and quite a range of colours. It is interesting to see that the catalogue lists that the chassis for the J 1 and J2 could be bought without bodywork for £175 which means that the bodywork only cost an extra £ 24.1 O.O. - rather less than it would cost to re-body a J2 nowadays! In the catalogue it also says th at if you were buying just the chassis you could have a set of four wings for £ 2.5.0. and the same price was charged for a bonnet. It also said that a fan could be fitted as an extra to the J 1 and J2 models although in a later catalogue this has been deleted.

 

Throughout it's production life the J2 experienced only one major external change. In late 1933 cars were given swept mudguards and running boards. This was one of several changes leading up to the 1933 Motor Show. Minor modifications over the production run included the extra outrigger bali bearing at the front end of the crankshaft, the fully­floating gudgeon pins, a successively stiffened windscreen frame (to be replaced by an altogether stronger item on the P-type), domed instead of flat glasses on the instruments (what an originality point for a concours!) and the replacement of the S.U. Petrolift by the S.U. electric fuel pump. The Jl was discontinued in mid-l 933 as, in effect, were the J3 and J4 models - Cecil Kimber was al ready looking forward to the 1934 season. The last J2 left Abingdon on lOth January 1934, only seven cars being built that year, and the decks were cleared ready for the production of the P-type. Thus, for some time, the J2 was the only 'small-cam' model in production, surrounded by K and L-types. No wonder Cecil Kimber wanted to give it a face-lift for the Motor Show.

 

The exploits of the cars in international competition are weil documented. The most successful J4 driver of 1933 was Hugh Hamilton. His ding-dong battie with the great Nuvolari in the 1933 R.A.C. Tourist Trophy is one of the most famous of motor racing stories. His class win at the Avusrennen and other races where he mixed it with full grand prix cars are a prime part of J4 lore. Bobby Kohlrausch campaigned the same car in Germany in 1934 with much success at Nationallevel. Maillard-Brune's car won the 1934 Bol d'Or 24-hour race, Rex King-Clark's car was first equal in the only ever tied race at Brooklands, and Mayer's car set Hungarian speed records at Tat.

 

Beside all this the J3 seems very low key. Eyston, Wisdom and Denly set International Class "H" speed records up to 24 hours at Montlhery, W. E. Belgrave's car won its class in the Alpine Trial but other attempts in the top echelon of motor sport at venues such as Le Mans and Monte Carlo did not bring success. One car was fitted with a salonette body (no good looking for it, it now wears something more conventional), and the last car to be built was fitted with the newfangled swept mudguards.


Hood and side curtain arrangemant on the prototype J2

1933 swept-wing J-Type These wings affording better weather protection were fitted from chassis J3438

Meanwhile the J2 took to club competition like a duck to water. Sheer weight of numbers ensured a measure of success. No less than seventeen won awards in the 1934 Abingdon Trial and ten of them aimed higher to enter that year's R.A.C. National Rally. J2s remained an active part of the club scene after the Second World War - Ken Rawlings example winning major trials as late as 1947. Today, Dudley Sterry's rather special car still gains a steady stream of awards in the toughest of trials and gives the moderns a run for their money. Seldom is it alone in the field. In races, J2s were overshadowed by their supercharged counterparts but Charles Druck's car finished two 24-hour Bol d'Or races. This leads us to the fact th at the 1934 Bol d'Or had among its starters a swept mudguard J2 driven by M. Balestre. Is th is the same as he who presided over the activities of the F.I.A recently? If so, one wonders what memories stirred when, fifty-five years later, he signed and sealed the F.I.A. Certificate for the first International Class speed records to be set by M.G. for over thirty years...... in, of all things, a J2.

Today very few J1 tourers and salonettes survive. Those that do have mostly been re­bodied as J2s which is a pity as an original J 1 salonette or tourer is an attractive looking car and would create quite a considerable amount of interest.

As a car to own today the J2 has a lot to recommend it. It is fairly simple compared with some of the other mode Is and as they are reasonably plentiful they still can be purchased at not too inflated prices. The bodywork and fittings are not too elaborate to work 'on and the cycle wings of the earlier models relatively inexpensive to obtain and easy to fit. As with all of the overhead cam cars the engines need to be worked fairly hard to obtain reasonable performance but with such a free revving unit, and such a good gearbox, this is no hardship. You also have the knowledge that you are driving a car which is a good piece of motoring history. In its day it was a trend setter, a very successful car in club competition and one which gained some success in National and International events. If it was the M-type which set Cecil Kimber on the raad to successful quantity praduction of small sports cars, th en it was the J2 which set the seal on th at success.
 

Production period 1932/34

   Numbers build:  J 1 open 262
                                     J 1 Salonette 117

                       J 2 2061

                   J 3 22

                J 4 9

                         chassis 23
To order click on the picture

This information is taken from the book "MG Road Cars" Four cilinder O.H.C. 1926-1936